Crescent Discovery Series

A reading room for breakthroughs and the curious mind

$28 billion a year of US preclinical research is irreproducible

Published attempts to repeat preclinical studies had reported failure rates between 51 and 89 percent.

Crescent Bioresearch18 April, 3:41 PMFreedman et al., PLOS Biology, 2015 · Global Biological Standards Institute2 min read

Researchers at the Global Biological Standards Institute and Boston University set out to put a price on that failure, and to find where in the research process it starts.

They estimated that about half of the US$56.4 billion spent each year on US preclinical research cannot be reproduced, roughly US$28 billion. Biological reagents and reference materials accounted for the largest share of the causes, 36.1 percent.

Study design came second at 27.6 percent. The authors pointed to misidentified or contaminated cell lines, estimated at 15 to 36 percent, and called for validated reagents and authentication throughout a study. The estimate carries wide bounds, but the ranking put materials first.

Crescent Discovery Series cover: $28 billion a year of US preclinical research is irreproducible

The biggest leak was the materials.

Source

  1. Freedman, L. P., Cockburn, I. M., & Simcoe, T. S. (2015). The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research. PLoS Biology, 13(6), e1002165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165
Crescent Discovery Series

Follow the series

New discoveries are published on our channels every day.

Keep going

Three more numbers